Approach to Teaching and Learning
At BFIS we are committed to a systematic and facilitated process for teams of teachers across the school to affirm, revise, and/or create curriculum. Through a formal curriculum review cycle our teachers explore research and current shifts in their subject areas and look for ways to improve and enhance curriculum, instruction, and assessment.
Our curriculum is aligned to progressive standards that have been developed for schools in the USA and adopted by international schools around the world.
Teachers are supported by our instructional leaders to create standards-based units of study using the Understanding by Design (UbD) planning process. We ask ourselves these critical questions when carefully designing developmentally appropriate units:
- What should students know and be able to do by the end of the unit? (Standards)
- How will we know that they have met these objectives/standards? (Assessment)
- How will students learn and practice the knowledge and skills throughout the unit? (Lessons, Activities, Formative Assessments) What will we do when they demonstrate mastery? (Differentiation, Enrichment, Extension) What will we do when they are not meeting the standards? (Differentiation, Support)
Philosophy of Assessment: Sound assessment begins with WHY.
Purpose refers to the reasons we assess learners and how we use the information. At BFIS, we believe that assessment serves multiple purposes. Consistent with educational research, we know that quality assessment practices do more than measure learning; assessment promotes learning. We use assessment for both summative and formative purposes. Summative assessments are carefully designed during the planning stages of a unit. They are intentionally crafted so that learners can demonstrate their ability to meet the learning objectives/standards at the end of the unit. The information is used to determine a learner's level of achievement. Formative assessments are used to identify where a learner is in relation to where they need to be in order to meet the learning objectives/standards. This information guides learning and informs daily instructional practices.
It is the shared responsibility between students, teachers and parents to use assessment to support and guide the learning process in the following ways:
Purpose of Assessment
Assessment for Students
|Assessment for Teachers||Assessment for Parents and Guardians|
|Identifying Assessment Criteria||
|Monitoring of Student Learning & Progress||
- Student behaviors such as: effort, participation, adherence to class rules, etc. will not be included in grade calculations. Grades will reflect only student performance toward standards/learning objectives. Student behaviors, or Approaches to Learning, will be assessed throughout the year and reported separately on report cards for each subject area/course.
- Work submitted late will not result in a lower grade. The consequence for not submitting work on time, will be through mandatory make-up. The grade should represent what a learner knows and can do in relation to the standards. When work is incomplete, there is no way to assess the current level knowledge, skills and understandings. A lower grade due to work submitted late distorts the reality of where a student is in relation to the standards.
- Extra credit or bonus points for non-academic work such as bringing in materials, covering books, etc. will not be included in grade determination.
- Academic dishonesty will not be punished with reduced grades. Academic dishonesty will carry behavioral consequences. *For IB students, the IB academic dishonesty policy will be followed.
- Attendance will not be considered in grade determination.
- Group scores from work done in cooperative learning groups will not be included in grade determination. Students will be assessed on collaboration and communication skills, separately from their individual ability to meet the standards for the course/subject.
Student behaviors such as effort, participation, timeliness and collaboration are key skills that must be taught and assessed separately from a student's ability to meet the content standards for each course. Both academic proficiency and how a student approaches learning are important and should be valued.
In line with our new assessment agreements, we spent time working out the systems for separating learning behaviors from academic achievement. We call these learning behaviors, “Approaches to Learning”. This gives students and their parents a better idea of who they are as learners and some of those soft skills that we know are an essential part of academic life and beyond. To bring cohesion as school, we have developed rubrics for these behaviors of a learner so that teachers, students and parents are all drawing from the same language and expectations from elementary, middle and high schools.
Our new report card format in the middle school and high school will provide more feedback and information for students and parents. In addition to the academic achievement grade for each subject/course, students are assessed on the following Approaches to Learning:
Attitude Toward Leaning: Demonstrates a positive disposition toward learning, Seeks/accepts feedback and uses it to improve learning, Demonstrates respect to others within the learning environment, Demonstrates persistence when faced with challenges, Demonstrates self-awareness of own strengths and areas for improvement
Self-Management: Respects timeliness, Uses time efficiently, Arrives to class prepared, Demonstrates organization skills, Demonstrates awareness of own actions and the ability to accept responsibility, Adheres to classroom and school rules and policies, Seek assistance when necessary
Participation & Collaboration: Cooperates and compromises within a group setting, Participates as an engaged, on-task, and focused learner, Demonstrates effective communication and problem solving skills, Works to resolve conflict.
Students are assessed on these Approaches to Learning using the following descriptors:
AOC- Area of Concern: As a learner, these skills and approaches to learning are still developing. The student has not shown evidence of meeting the expectations with consistency
SAT- Satisfactory: As a learner, these skills and approaches to learning are developing appropriately. The student has shown evidence of meeting the expectations with consistency.
AOS-Area of Strength: As a learner, these skills and approaches to learning are an established skill set. The student has shown evidence of exceeding the expectations with consistency.
To see the rubric that teachers and students use as criteria for the Approaches to Learning click the following link: Approaches to learning in MS/HS
Differentiated instruction is much more than simply teaching different content to different students. Rather, it is a philosophy of education that puts the student at the center of the learning process; supports the academic, social, and emotional needs of each child, and inspires students and enables them to reach their full potential. Differentiation is an approach that builds on the strengths of each child and guides and supports them in addressing and overcoming their personal challenges.
It is clear that in order to prepare students to lead in a 21st century work environment, we have to provide a 21st century learning environment. Innovation and technology are providing new ways of teaching and learning beyond interactive boards and computers in the classroom, increasing student engagement and active learning.
To prepare our learners for college, career and life as engaged global citizens, our teachers design learning experiences and assessments that call for the application and transfer of 21st century skills. These skills include: critical thinking, problem solving, creativity, innovation, communication, collaboration, and leadership.
Students in smaller classes perform better in all subjects and on all assessment when compared to their peers in larger classes. Small classes involve students, encourage their participation and it allows teachers to know their students well to guide their growth and development. Small class size fosters sharing, empathy and teamwork.
Average class size is 18 students.
Social and Emotional Learning is the process through which children and adults acquire the knowledge, attitudes, and skills they need to recognize and manage their emotions, demonstrate caring and concern for others, establish positive relationships, make responsible decisions, and handle challenging situations constructively. These are the skills that allow children to calm themselves down when angry, make friends, resolve conflicts respectfully, and make ethical and safe choices. The BFIS approach to social and emotional learning is a two-fold approach that provides consistency within the educational program and also flexibility to differentiate when needed, developing effective instructional methods that are active, participatory and engaging.
AT BFIS the diversity of our student body, faculty and parent community- now comprised over 50 different nationalities and cultural heritages- brings a rich diversity of knowledge and experiences to the classroom, helping our students to appreciate and understand differences, as well as develop an open-minded perspective to create a more tolerant and respectful society.
At BFIS we model and promote a community of learners. Our students are not the only learners on campus. Our approach to teaching and learning involves continuous growth and improvement for teachers as well.
BFIS faculty members are committed to continually improving their skills and the instructional strategies they use to reach our students, and our school is committed to supporting their growth.
In order to support a diverse faculty charged with implementing a wide-ranging educational program, our professional development approach consists of four main components:
- In house workshops during our weekly Professional And Collaborative Time (PACT) and Professional Development (PD) Days.
- Personal PD funds that our teachers can utilise to self-select in order to grow in their professional goals.
- Cohort Model of Professional Development with other international schools in Spain and led by expert consultants throughout the world.
- Job-embedded and ongoing training offered by our instructional leaders, including coaches and curriculum leaders. This also includes a comprehensive teacher evaluation system, using the Danielson Framework, which has been adopted by many schools around the world.
Video EF Explore America
Learning in the XXI Century